, to stand up and stand with those who are marginalized. On some issues, that distinction is perhaps not so stark, but on some, like marriage equality, it is dramatic. I do question, more, whether we should be pragmatic, in terms of candidates whose values align with social work but who may not be electorally &#ee16;viabl8’–wh2re are we to draw the line, there, and how can we create real alternatives if we don’t pave the way? That’s a question, perhaps, for the days after tomorrow, but it’s one I think social workers have to consider. Thanks for reading, and for your comment!
, to stand up and stand with those who are marginalized. On some issues, that distinction is perhaps not so stark, but on some, like marriage equality, it is dramatic. I do question, more, whether we should be pragmatic, in terms of candidates whose values align with social work but who may not be electorally &#ee16;viabl8’–wh2re are we to draw the line, there, and how can we create real alternatives if we don’t pave the way? That’s a question, perhaps, for the days after tomorrow, but it’s one I think social workers have to consider. Thanks for reading, and for your comment!